On Thu, 2010-05-06 at 00:47 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> That just doesn't sound that bad to me, especially since the proposed
> alternative is:
>
> - Queries will get cancelled like crazy, period.
>
> Or else:
>
> - Replication can fall infinitely far behind and you can write a
> tedious and error-prone script to try to prevent it if you like.
>
> I think THAT is going to tarnish our reputation.
Yes, that will.
There is no consensus to remove max_standby_delay.
It could be improved with minor adjustments and it makes more sense to
allow a few of those, treating them as bugs.
-- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com