Re: elog(PANIC) should abort()?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: elog(PANIC) should abort()?
Дата
Msg-id 12700.1038361196@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: elog(PANIC) should abort()?  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> Tom Lane writes:
>> I am thinking it would be useful for debugging if elog(PANIC) were to
>> exit by calling abort() so that a core dump would be produced.

> But is this appropriate?

> PANIC:  The database cluster was initialized with CATALOG_VERSION_NO 200210181,
>         but the backend was compiled with CATALOG_VERSION_NO 200211021.
>         It looks like you need to initdb.
> Aborted (core dumped)

Hm.  We could possibly reduce those particular messages to FATAL.

OTOH, it's not unreasonable that seeing those messages *in the field*
might be an appropriate situation for a core dump.  I think as
developers we sometimes have a skewed sense of what's common ;-)

Ever since Bruce introduced the additional elog levels, I have felt it
would be a good idea to go through all the elog calls and re-evaluate
what levels they should have.  It's a lot o' work though...
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "XiaojingLi"
Дата:
Сообщение: updating on views
Следующее
От: Stephan Szabo
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: updating on views