Re: proposal: more practical view on function's source code

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Eisentraut
Тема Re: proposal: more practical view on function's source code
Дата
Msg-id 1269293023.14588.10.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: proposal: more practical view on function's source code  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: proposal: more practical view on function's source code  (Steve Atkins <steve@blighty.com>)
Re: proposal: more practical view on function's source code  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On sön, 2010-03-21 at 20:40 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> >        \ef function-name line-number
> > with suitable magic to get the editor to place the cursor at that line.
> > I suspect this wouldn't be too hard to do with emacs --- what do you
> > think about vi?
> 
> Well, in vi you can just do "vi +linenum filename".

I think that's a pretty widely spread convention.  A quick test shows
that all of emacs, vi, joe, and nano support this.  Of course there are
editors that don't support it, so we'll have to distinguish that
somehow, but it won't be too complicated to support a few of the common
editors.




В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Josh Berkus
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: 9.0 release notes done
Следующее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: xmlconcat (was 9.0 release notes done)