Re: Remaining 9.5 open items

Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> writes:
> I noticed in passing that the role removal documentation should really
> also discuss shared objects (as the DROP OWNED BY reference page does).

If you're speaking of section 20.4, that text is all my fault ... but
I'm not clear on what you think needs to be added?  The first DROP OWNED
BY will take care of any privileges on shared objects, so I didn't really
think we need to burden the recipe with that detail.
        regards, tom lane