Re: [HACKERS] libpqrcv_PQexec() seems to violate latch protocol
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] libpqrcv_PQexec() seems to violate latch protocol |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1236.1496783699@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | [HACKERS] libpqrcv_PQexec() seems to violate latch protocol (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] libpqrcv_PQexec() seems to violate latch protocol
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> The function in $subject does:
> ResetLatch(&MyProc->procLatch);
> rc = WaitLatchOrSocket(&MyProc->procLatch,
> WL_POSTMASTER_DEATH | WL_SOCKET_READABLE |
> WL_LATCH_SET,
> PQsocket(streamConn),
> 0,
> WAIT_EVENT_LIBPQWALRECEIVER);
Yeah, this is certainly broken.
> Afaict, the ResetLatch() really should just instead be in the if (rc & WL_LATCH_SET) block.
And, to be specific, it should be before the CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS call,
since that is the useful work that we want to be sure occurs after
any latch-setting event.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: