On Thu, 2009-02-12 at 13:39 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Right, that's what I meant --- do all the work within pg_dump.
>
> > Is this acceptable to everyone? We could name the option
> > -u/--upgrade-compatible.
>
> If the switch is specifically for pg_upgrade support (enabling this as
> well as any other hacks we find necessary), which seems like a good
> idea, then don't chew up a short option letter for it. There should be
> a long form only. And probably not even list it in the user
> documentation.
Why wouldn't we want to list it?
Joshua D. Drake
>
> regards, tom lane
>
--
PostgreSQL - XMPP: jdrake@jabber.postgresql.org Consulting, Development, Support, Training 503-667-4564 -
http://www.commandprompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997