Re: Should we document IS [NOT] OF?

Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> writes:
> On 11/19/20 12:08 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Here's a proposed patch for that.  I was amused to discover that we have
>> a couple of regression test cases making use of IS OF.

> I didn't check but those might be my fault ;-)

I suspect at least one of them is mine ;-).  But I didn't check.

> Looks good to me.

Thanks for looking!

            regards, tom lane