Re: [HACKERS] fix hard-coded index in make_partition_op_expr
От
Amit Langote
Тема
Re: [HACKERS] fix hard-coded index in make_partition_op_expr
Дата
Msg-id
12137aa5-0b5b-2084-4c9b-bcd670cf23c2@lab.ntt.co.jp
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
[HACKERS] fix hard-coded index in make_partition_op_expr Jeevan Ladhe <jeevan.ladhe@enterprisedb.com>
Re: [HACKERS] fix hard-coded index in make_partition_op_expr Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] fix hard-coded index in make_partition_op_expr Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Re: [HACKERS] fix hard-coded index in make_partition_op_expr Jeevan Ladhe <jeevan.ladhe@enterprisedb.com>
On 2017/05/18 3:43, Robert Haas wrote: > On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 5:38 AM, Jeevan Ladhe > wrote: >> While browsing through the partitioning code, I noticed that a recent commit >> f8bffe9e6d700fd34759a92e47930ce9ba7dcbd5, which fixes multi-column range >> partitioning constraints, introduced a function make_partition_op_expr, that >> takes keynum as a input parameter to identify the index of the partition >> key. >> In case of range partition we can have multiple partition keys but for list >> partition we have only one. Considering that, I think following code does >> not >> cause any side-effect logically(and may be a oversight while moving the code >> from function get_qual_for_list to this function): >> >> saopexpr->inputcollid = key->partcollation[0]; >> saopexpr->args = list_make2(arg1, arg2); >> >> But as we have keynum now, should we be using it to index >> key->partcollation, >> instead of a hard coded '0'. > > Agreed. Committed your patch. Me too, thanks both. Regards, Amit
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
От: Michael Paquier
Дата: