Re: pg_dump additional options for performance
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_dump additional options for performance |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1202749860.16770.123.camel@ebony.site обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_dump additional options for performance (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_dump additional options for performance
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 2008-02-11 at 11:51 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes: > > I think this is pretty unwieldy. > > I agree. Since any multiple-output-file case can't usefully use stdout, > I think we should combine the switches and just have one switch that > says both that you want separated output and what the target filename > is. Thus something like > > --pre-schema-file = foo > --data-file = bar > --post-schema-file = baz > > where specifying any of these suppresses the "normal" output to stdout. > So, if you give just a subset of them, you get just subset output. > > With this design, --schema-only, --data-only, and --file are obsolete, > and we should probably throw an error if any of them are used in > combination with these switches. Looks good from here. -- Simon Riggs 2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: