Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Тема Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review
Дата
Msg-id 1191988786.7258.37.camel@localhost.localdomain
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review  (Hannu Krosing <hannu@skype.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On Wed, 2007-10-10 at 06:25 +0300, Hannu Krosing wrote:
> Should packagers be concerned with /contrib at all ?

IMHO, yes. We (PGDG RPMs) ship contrib modules with a separate RPM, in
case someone wants to use it.

> Arguably, a good packager should make its own decisions about what to
> include in his/her/its packages, which may include stuff from
> pgfoundry and also may omit stuff from /contrib .

It is not packager's decision to add/remove software from PostgreSQL
code. A packager should be responsible to ship the software which is the
(almost) the same as PostgreSQL Core (of course we add some patches, but
they do not change the functionality, etc).

...for example, I built many pgfoundry modules as seperate packages (and
they will be available with a yum repository next week or so)

http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other

Regards
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, ODBCng - http://www.commandprompt.com/



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Joshua D. Drake"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review
Следующее
От: Shane Ambler
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review