Re: libpq changes for synchronous replication
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: libpq changes for synchronous replication |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 11876.1284999461@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: libpq changes for synchronous replication (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: libpq changes for synchronous replication
Re: libpq changes for synchronous replication Re: libpq changes for synchronous replication |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> It doesn't feel right to always accept PQputCopyData in COPY OUT mode,
> though. IMHO there should be a new COPY IN+OUT mode.
Yeah, I was going to make the same complaint. Breaking basic
error-checking functionality in libpq is not very acceptable.
> It should be pretty safe to add a CopyInOutResponse message to the
> protocol without a protocol version bump. Thoughts on that?
Not if it's something that an existing application might see. If
it can only happen in replication mode it's OK.
Personally I think this demonstrates that piggybacking replication
data transfer on the COPY protocol was a bad design to start with.
It's probably time to split them apart.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: