Re: getProcedureColumns
| От | thomas.risberg |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: getProcedureColumns |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 11399776.post@talk.nabble.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: getProcedureColumns (Kris Jurka <books@ejurka.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: getProcedureColumns
|
| Список | pgsql-jdbc |
Kris, Thanks for the patched driver. It worked great for my simple test case. Any idea when this will be released or in beta? Thanks, Thomas Risberg Kris Jurka wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2 Jul 2007, thomas.risberg wrote: > >> So it seems that it is not possible to construct the appropriate call >> sequence just based on the metadata when there are multiple out >> parameters. >> > > Right, the current metadata returned is based on the pg_proc.argtypes > field which only contains the in and in/out parameters to a function. A > new column pg_proc.allargtypes was added in support of out functions and > the driver was never updated to use it. So that should be part of the > fixes that the patch under discussion covers. If your willing to do some > testing I've built a driver version with the patch included and put it up > here: > > http://www.ejurka.com/pgsql/jars/tr/ > > Kris Jurka > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at > > http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/getProcedureColumns-tf3147414.html#a11399776 Sent from the PostgreSQL - jdbc mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: