> What about
> for i in ...
> ... new.(tg_argv[i]) ...
Ooof! <clutches chest, falls to ground groaning> Constants or digits or
nothing, then <gets up, dusts himself off>
> MHO: this is a really ugly wart on the language, and it does not solve
> the problems people would want to solve. It might solve *your* problem
> but that's not enough to justify a wart of this size.
<falls down again> But my warts are beautiful!
OK, fair enough. I had to try.
> We do need to do something about the fact that EXECUTE can't access
> plpgsql variables, though I'm afraid that fixing that is going to
> require a rather complete overhaul of plpgsql :-(. But it needs one
> anyway.
Look forward to seeing it.
Matt