Re: GiST: PickSplit and multi-attr indexes
От
Neil Conway
Тема
Re: GiST: PickSplit and multi-attr indexes
Дата
Msg-id
1100578365.23420.71.camel@localhost.localdomain
Ответ на
Re: GiST: PickSplit and multi-attr indexes (Tom Lane)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
GiST: PickSplit and multi-attr indexes Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>
Re: GiST: PickSplit and multi-attr indexes Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: GiST: PickSplit and multi-attr indexes Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>
Re: GiST: PickSplit and multi-attr indexes Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: GiST: PickSplit and multi-attr indexes Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>
Re: GiST: PickSplit and multi-attr indexes Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: GiST: PickSplit and multi-attr indexes Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>
Re: GiST: PickSplit and multi-attr indexes Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>
Re: GiST: PickSplit and multi-attr indexes Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: GiST: PickSplit and multi-attr indexes Oleg Bartunov <oleg@sai.msu.su>
On Mon, 2004-11-15 at 10:19 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > I'm not familiar with the details of the GiST code, but would it work to > generalize PickSplit to return a three-way classification? That is, > instead of actually splitting the node, have it identify each item as > "definitely left", "definitely right", or "don't care" (think "less", > "greater", or "equal to" the desired split value). I had thought about this solution, but I was worried that it will actually make GiST a less general framework, because it requires that the PickSplit() method effectively order the leaves of the tree. For btree that is a reasonable assumption to make, but I'm not sure if it can or should be made in general. That said, I haven't actually implemented any indexes using GiST; perhaps Oleg or Teodor can comment? -Neil
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления