В Птн, 05.11.2004, в 21:40, Heikki Linnakangas пишет:
> On Fri, 5 Nov 2004, Travis P wrote:
>
> > Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> >> Interestingly, the subversion repository is 585MB, and the CVS repository
> > is only 260MB,
> >
> > BDB or FSFS back-end? FSFS seems to require less space. (The BDB backend
> > tends to pre-allocate space though, so maybe there was a big jump, but then
> > growth will slow markedly, so making a comparison for a repository that will
> > continue to grow is difficult.)
>
> BDB.
Here's what the subversion book has to say about that:
http://svnbook.red-bean.com/svnbook-1.1/ch05.html#svn-ch-5-sect-1.2.A
We use svn over ssh and recently switched to fsfs because of the umask
problem and because read-only access to bdb causes writes to the
database.
--
Markus Bertheau <twanger@bluetwanger.de>