Re: proposal: new polymorphic types - commontype and commontypearray

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: proposal: new polymorphic types - commontype and commontypearray
Дата
Msg-id 10776.1584551344@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: proposal: new polymorphic types - commontype and commontypearray  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: proposal: new polymorphic types - commontype and commontypearray  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> writes:
> st 18. 3. 2020 v 17:54 odesílatel Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> napsal:
>> No, because if you've got that alongside foo2(anycompatible,
>> anycompatible) then your queries will fail due to both functions
>> matching anything that's promotable to text.

> It is working for anyelement

[ pokes at that... ]  Hm, looks like you're getting away with that
because of the preference for functions taking preferred types.
Seems pretty shaky to me though --- you can probably invent
cases that will throw 'ambiguous function' if you try a bit harder.
In any case, I don't think users will understand why they have to
write two versions of the same function.

            regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Berserk Autovacuum (let's save next Mandrill)
Следующее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: type of some table storage params on doc