On Thu, 2003-06-19 at 21:22, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > There is no alternative, unless you want the command to be
> > non-roll-back-able.
>
> Well, you can do a cluster-type table duplication...
Thats still double the disk space, although that has the nice side
effect of not requiring a vacuum.
--
Rod Taylor <rbt@rbt.ca>
PGP Key: http://www.rbt.ca/rbtpub.asc