On Wed, 2003-03-19 at 18:55, Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
> Does the change worth the trouble ?
> Please don't break BACKWARD COMPATIBILITY easily.
If it's important enough, we can provide a GUC option for it.
My guess is that a GUC option isn't needed, but then again we've been
criticized for disregarding backward compatibility in the past...
Cheers,
Neil