Tom Lane kirjutas R, 14.03.2003 kell 19:15:
> Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu> writes:
> > So, just to throw out a wild idea: If you're talking about making large
> > changes to the on-the-wire protocol. Have you considered using an existing
> > database protocol?
>
> Yeah, I have. Didn't look promising --- there's no percentage unless
> we're 100% compatible, which creates a lot of problems (eg, can't ship
> type OIDs to frontend anymore).
Surely there is a way to ship type info, even for UDT's (user defined
types) as nowadays most big databases support those.
> What I actually looked into was RDA, but I doubt that TDS would be any
> closer to our needs...
I remember someone started cleaning up IO in order to move it into a
separate module with the aim of making multiple implementations (RDA,
TDS, XML, native JDBC wire protocol if it ever becomes a reality, etc.)
possible.
While not exactly pertinent to new wire protocol this effort if
completed would make it much easier to have backwards compatibility on
the wire level.
------------
Hannu
PS. Another feature I'd like is individually turning off warnings and
notices.
------------
Hannu