On Wed, 2003-03-05 at 10:39, Eric D Nielsen wrote:
> > Gavin Sherry <swm@linuxworld.com.au> writes:
> > > I haven't had time to look into it further, but it occurs to me that
> > > handling views which rely on joins would be far from trivial.
> >
> > Views containing joins would not be updatable; problem solved.
>
> I see how that is what the spec says, but aren't the majority of joins that
> people use/want to update a join of some type? I thought that SQL99 allowed
> updating view created by joins.
>
> In either case is this a place where "exceeding" the spec would be a good
> thing or a bad thing?
Lets try to meet the spec first, then debate about whether extending it
is a good or bad thing :)
--
Rod Taylor <rbt@rbt.ca>
PGP Key: http://www.rbt.ca/rbtpub.asc