Re: New pg_lsn type doesn't have hash/btree opclasses

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: New pg_lsn type doesn't have hash/btree opclasses
Дата
Msg-id 10449.1399678959@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: New pg_lsn type doesn't have hash/btree opclasses  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: New pg_lsn type doesn't have hash/btree opclasses  (Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> writes:
> On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 10:49 PM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Yes unless many people object the commit.
>> 
>> Michael,
>> You're now modifying the patch?
> Not within a couple of days.

I think it's really too late for this for 9.4.  At this point it's
less than 48 hours until beta1 wraps, and we do not have the bandwidth
to do anything but worry about stabilizing the features we've already
got.
        regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: New pg_lsn type doesn't have hash/btree opclasses
Следующее
От: Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: New pg_lsn type doesn't have hash/btree opclasses