Re: PostGres Doubt

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Hannu Krosing
Тема Re: PostGres Doubt
Дата
Msg-id 1023963618.12488.0.camel@taru.tm.ee
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: PostGres Doubt  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 2002-06-12 at 19:38, Tom Lane wrote:
> David Ford <david+cert@blue-labs.org> writes:
> > So reentrancy in libpq basically is put on hold until 7.3.
> 
> Only if you insist on using "crypt", which is deprecated anyway.
> md5 is the preferred encryption method.
> 
> My feeling about the proposed patch was that crypt is now a legacy auth
> method, and it's not clear that we should create platform/library
> dependencies just to support making multiple connections simultaneously
> under crypt auth.  (Note that *using* connections concurrently is not
> at issue, only whether you can execute the authentication phase of
> startup concurrently.)

can't this be solved by simple locking ?

I know that postgres team can do locking properly ;)

--------------
Hannu



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tatsuo Ishii
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCHES] Chinese GB18030 support is implemented!
Следующее
От: Hannu Krosing
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Feature request: Truncate table