Re: reducing the overhead of frequent table locks - now, with WIP patch

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Joshua Berkus
Тема Re: reducing the overhead of frequent table locks - now, with WIP patch
Дата
Msg-id 1020950579.114171.1307467286074.JavaMail.root@mail-1.01.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: reducing the overhead of frequent table locks - now, with WIP patch  (Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>)
Ответы 9.1 release scheduling (was Re: reducing the overhead of frequent table locks - now, with WIP patch)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
> iew. The
> reason we usually skip the summer isn't actually a wholesale lack of
> people - it's because it's not so good from a publicity perspective,
> and it's hard to get all the packagers around at the same time.

Actually, the summer is *excellent* from a publicity perspective ... at least, June and July are.  Both of those months
arefull of US conferences whose PR we can piggyback on to make a splash.
 

August is really the only "bad" month from a PR perspective, because we lose a lot of our European RCs, and there's no
bandwagonsto jump on.  But even August has the advantage of having no major US or Christian holidays to interfere with
releasedates.
 

However, we're more likely to have an issue with *packager* availability in August.  Besides, isn't this a little
premature? Last I looked, we still have some big nasty open items.
 

-- 
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
San Francisco


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Jeff Davis
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Range Types and extensions
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: reducing the overhead of frequent table locks - now, with WIP patch