Re: array_length(anyarray)

On Jan10, 2014, at 11:00 , Merlin Moncure  wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 3:52 AM, Marko Tiikkaja  wrote:
>> On 1/10/14, 10:41 AM, Merlin Moncure wrote:
>>> 
>>> What's needed for better iteration support (IMO)
>>> is a function that does what unnest does but returns an array on
>>> indexes (one per dimsension) -- a generalization of the
>>> _pg_expandarray function.  Lets' say 'unnest_dims'.
>> 
>> 
>> So  unnest_dims('{{1,2},{3,4}}'::int[])  would return  VALUES (1,
>> '{1,2}'::int[]), (2, '{3,4}'::int[])?  If so, then yes, that's a
>> functionality I've considered us to have been missing for a long time.
> 
> not quite.  it returns int[], anyelement: so, using your example, you'd get:
> 
> [1,1], 1
> [1,2], 2
> [2,1], 3
> [2,2], 4

Now that we have WITH ORDINALITY, it'd be sufficient to have a
variant of array_dims() that returns int[][] instead of text, say
array_dimsarray(). Your unnest_dims could then be written as
 unnest(array_dimsarray(array)) with ordinality

best regards,
florian pflug