Re: pg_dump.options.diff

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Serguei Mokhov
Тема
Re: pg_dump.options.diff
Дата
Msg-id
005701c2b2b1$8e923fe0$0301a8c0@gunnymede.lan
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Re: pg_dump.options.diff "Serguei Mokhov" <mokhov@cs.concordia.ca>
Re: pg_dump.options.diff Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: pg_dump.options.diff Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: pg_dump.options.diff Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: pg_dump.options.diff Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Tom Lane" 
Sent: January 02, 2003 3:20 PM

> > #if defined(HAVE_GETOPT_LONG)
> > #define xo(long,short,desc)  printf("%s %s\n", long, desc)
> > #else
> > #define xo(long,short,desc)  printf("%s %s\n", short, desc)
> > #endif
> 
> > seems relatively generic, so it could be used by more than one tool.
> 
> But there's no good place to put it.  I'd say just stick it into each
> tool; it's no worse than repeating the existence of a "usage()"
> subroutine in each tool.

It ended up being in dumputils.h

Attached a patch for pg_dump(all) and pg_restore eliminating dupes
in option descriptions as per above xo "technology".

Please review and apply if there are no too many objections.

thank you,
-s
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
FAQ