Re: pg_dump.options.diff
От
Serguei Mokhov
Тема
Re: pg_dump.options.diff
Дата
Msg-id
005701c2b2b1$8e923fe0$0301a8c0@gunnymede.lan
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Re: pg_dump.options.diff "Serguei Mokhov" <mokhov@cs.concordia.ca>
Re: pg_dump.options.diff Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: pg_dump.options.diff Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: pg_dump.options.diff Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: pg_dump.options.diff Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Lane"
Sent: January 02, 2003 3:20 PM
> > #if defined(HAVE_GETOPT_LONG)
> > #define xo(long,short,desc) printf("%s %s\n", long, desc)
> > #else
> > #define xo(long,short,desc) printf("%s %s\n", short, desc)
> > #endif
>
> > seems relatively generic, so it could be used by more than one tool.
>
> But there's no good place to put it. I'd say just stick it into each
> tool; it's no worse than repeating the existence of a "usage()"
> subroutine in each tool.
It ended up being in dumputils.h
Attached a patch for pg_dump(all) and pg_restore eliminating dupes
in option descriptions as per above xo "technology".
Please review and apply if there are no too many objections.
thank you,
-s
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата: