Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] A hook for session start

On 11/19/2017 04:49 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan  writes:
>> I think this:
>>     #define IsClientBackend() \
>>         (MyBackendId != InvalidBackendId &&    \
>>          !IsAutoVacuumLauncherProcess() &&    \
>>          !IsAutoVacuumWorkerProcess() && \
>>          !am_walsender && \
>>          !IsBackgroundWorker)
>> probably belongs somewhere more central. Surely this isn't the only
>> place that we want to be able to run such a test?
> Hm.  It also seems awfully awkward.  Perhaps it's not being used anyplace
> performance-critical, but regardless of speed it seems like a modularity
> violation, in that client backends have to be explicitly aware of
> everything that isn't a "client backend".
>
> Maybe it's time to invent something corresponding to AuxProcType
> for non "aux" processes, or else to fold all types of Postgres
> processes into the same enum.



Yes, agreed, The above is pretty ugly and likely to be quite fragile.

cheers

andrew

-- 
Andrew Dunstan                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services