> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-hackers-owner@hub.org [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@hub.org]On
> Behalf Of Matthias Urlichs
>
> Why they do that is another question entirely. (a) these tables should
> have indices, and (b) whatever postgres wants to know should have been
> cached someplace. Oh yes, (c) what's in pg_index that needs to be 4
> MBytes big?
>
What does 'vacuum pg_index' show ?
Regards.
Hiroshi Inoue
Inoue@tpf.co.jp