Re: Very high effective_cache_size == worse performance?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Scott Marlowe
Тема Re: Very high effective_cache_size == worse performance?
Дата
Msg-id z2hdcc563d11004201130u8b1a6fmeb76b65111adf1ee@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Very high effective_cache_size == worse performance?  (David Kerr <dmk@mr-paradox.net>)
Ответы Re: Very high effective_cache_size == worse performance?  (David Kerr <dmk@mr-paradox.net>)
Список pgsql-performance
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 12:28 PM, David Kerr <dmk@mr-paradox.net> wrote:
>
> I'm logging via syslog, I've had trouble with that before. when i moved to syslog-ng
> on my dev environments that mostly resoved the probelm for me. but these machines
> still have vanilla syslog.

Yea, I almost always log directly via stdout on production machines
because of that.

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: David Kerr
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Very high effective_cache_size == worse performance?
Следующее
От: David Kerr
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Very high effective_cache_size == worse performance?