In article <20030502141444.GC13419@libertyrms.info>,
Andrew Sullivan <andrew@libertyrms.info> wrote:
>Neither, assuming you have good hardware and you're using fsync. WAL
>is there precisely to make the system crash safe. (Of course, if
>it's sitting on an ext2 partition and the system goes down hard, you
>have a different batch of problems. But WAL+fsync protects you from
>postmaster crashes, and machine crashes if your filesystem is
>crash-safe.)
You seem to be implying that ext2+fsync is not machine crash safe. Is this
really what you are trying to say?
If so, could you point to docs that verify that?
I could definitely see where ext2 without fsync would leave the system in
an strange state, but with fsync it should be fine.
mrc
--
Mike Castle dalgoda@ix.netcom.com www.netcom.com/~dalgoda/
We are all of us living in the shadow of Manhattan. -- Watchmen
fatal ("You are in a maze of twisty compiler features, all different"); -- gcc