Re: Fusion-io ioDrive

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jeffrey Baker
Тема Re: Fusion-io ioDrive
Дата
Msg-id fd145f7d0807070910w413328favf8b2fb656e1c96a8@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Fusion-io ioDrive  ("Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-performance
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 6:08 AM, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 2:41 AM, Jeffrey Baker <jwbaker@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>                            Service Time Percentile, millis
>>>        R/W TPS   R-O TPS      50th   80th   90th   95th
>>> RAID      182       673         18     32     42     64
>>> Fusion    971      4792          8      9     10     11
>>
>> Someone asked for bonnie++ output:
>>
>> Block output: 495MB/s, 81% CPU
>> Block input: 676MB/s, 93% CPU
>> Block rewrite: 262MB/s, 59% CPU
>>
>> Pretty respectable.  In the same ballpark as an HP MSA70 + P800 with
>> 25 spindles.
>
> You left off the 'seeks' portion of the bonnie++ results -- this is
> actually the most important portion of the test.  Based on your tps
> #s, I'm expecting seeks equiv of about 10 10k drives in configured in
> a raid 10, or around 1000-1500.  They didn't publish any prices so
> it's hard to say if this is 'cost competitive'.

I left it out because bonnie++ reports it as "+++++" i.e. greater than
or equal to 100000 per second.

-jwb

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Jonah H. Harris"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Fusion-io ioDrive
Следующее
От: PFC
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Fusion-io ioDrive