Re: XID wraparound in 8.4

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Anj Adu
Тема Re: XID wraparound in 8.4
Дата
Msg-id f2fd819a0910131451y4e433470q35107f1248e7fef2@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: XID wraparound in 8.4  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Ответы Re: XID wraparound in 8.4
Список pgsql-admin
Assuming that autovacuum is off in 8,2 and upwards versions, would I
still have to do a database-wide vacuumdb  OR would vacuuming
individual tables that are permanent be sufficient to take care of XID
wraparound?

2009/8/11 Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>:
> Anj Adu escribió:
>> Reason we dont turn on autovacuum is that we are a "high-volume"
>> insert shop with minimal updates..We have about 200 million inserts
>> and a few thousand updates only. Most tables are partitions and get
>> dropped as part of the purge. Hence..autovacuum is a waste of
>> resources. However...the XID issue will force the need for an
>> autovacuum at some point..hence we do it as a one-off occasionally.
>
> Hmm, in 8.2 you won't need to vacuum any tables that you drop or
> truncate.  Only permanent tables will need to be vacuumed once in a
> while.
>
> --
> Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
>

В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Michael Graziano
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Warm standby questions
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: XID wraparound in 8.4