Re: Inefficient bytea escaping?

On 5/27/06, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> "Marko Kreen" <markokr@gmail.com> writes:
> > If you want to use fwrite as string operator, then maybe
> > should replace it with fwrite_unlocked?
>
> ISTM that in a single-threaded application such as the backend,
> it should be libc's responsibility to avoid such overhead, not
> ours.

Obviously, except glibc guys seems to be philosophically
opposed to this, so apps need to work around it.

AFAIK at least *BSDs have got this right, don't know
about others.

-- 
marko