On Tue, 17 Jun 2003 00:46:54 +0200, Ernest E Vogelsinger
<ernest@vogelsinger.at> wrote:
>For the first time run it executes in 1.5 - 2 seconds. From the second
>time, only 10 msec are needed for the same result
I'd call it inconsistent, if it were the other way round :-) I guess
you are seeing the effects of disk caching. Watch the drive LED
during the first run ...
Servus
Manfred