On Thu, 7 Jul 2011, John R Pierce wrote:
> if your original table has Primary Key of (sta_type, secondary_type) I
> would not expect EITHER of those fields to be unique by themselves....
> Surely there can be more than one of the same sta_type with different
> secondary_type's, just as there could be more than one secondary_type with
> different sta_types.... if either of these fields is unique of and by
> itself, it doesn't make sense to use the combined primary key.
John,
Ah, yes. Of course. That's why the compound primary key is required. I'll
redo the table the proper way.
Thanks,
Rich