Re: I have a fusion IO drive available for testing

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От david@lang.hm
Тема Re: I have a fusion IO drive available for testing
Дата
Msg-id alpine.DEB.1.10.0903271026590.20251@asgard.lang.hm
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на I have a fusion IO drive available for testing  (Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com>)
Ответы Re: I have a fusion IO drive available for testing
Re: I have a fusion IO drive available for testing
Список pgsql-performance
On Thu, 26 Mar 2009, Dave Cramer wrote:

> So far using dd I am seeing around 264MB/s on ext3, 335MB/s on ext2 write
> speed. So the question becomes what is the best filesystem for this drive?

until the current mess with ext3 and fsync gets resolved, i would say it
would probably be a bad choice. I consider ext4 too new, so I would say
XFS or ext2 (depending on if you need the journal or not)

for the WAL you definantly don't need the journal, for the data I'm not
sure. I believe that postgres does appropriate fsync calls so is safe on a
non-journaling filesystem. the fusionIO devices are small enough that a
fsync on them does not take that long, so it may not be worth the overhead
of the journaling.

David Lang

> Anyone want me to run anything on it ?
>
> Dave
>

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Jeff
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: I have a fusion IO drive available for testing
Следующее
От: Matthew Wakeling
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Very specialised query