Re: Eternal vacuuming....
| От | Marc G. Fournier |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Eternal vacuuming.... |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | Pine.BSF.4.21.0005111503340.82196-100000@hub.org обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Eternal vacuuming.... (Tim Perdue <tperdue@valinux.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 11 May 2000, Tim Perdue wrote:
> "Marc G. Fournier" wrote:
> > what does a 'vacuum verbose' show for you? and youa ren't doing a 'vacuum
> > analyze', are you?
>
> I believe I did 'vacuum analyze'. If info from 'vacuum verbose' would be
> useful to your team, I can try to set up and reproduce this. I would
> have to create a 3-million row table with an index on it, then delete
> 832,000 rows which I did last nite, then try again.
Okay, vacuum analyze is, from my experiences, atrociously slow ... it
*feels* faster, at least, if you do a simple vacuum first, then do the
analyze, but that might be just perception ...
Can you try just a simple 'vacuum verbose' first, without the analyze, and
see if that also takes 12hrs?
Also, what are you running this on? Memory? CPU?
Marc G. Fournier scrappy@hub.org
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
scrappy@{postgresql|isc}.org ICQ#7615664
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: