Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt?
| От | The Hermit Hacker |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | Pine.BSF.4.21.0005050239350.56194-100000@thelab.hub.org обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt? (Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>) |
| Ответы |
Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt?
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 5 May 2000, Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> > Hiroshi did commit a change to doc/src/sgml/ref/postgres-ref.sgml for
> > that just a few days ago, but I guess it didn't make it into the derived
> > files that Thomas was preparing off-line. I believe there were several
> > other small doco fixes while Thomas was on vacation --- I dunno if he
> > plans to try to get those into the 7.0 derived docs or not.
>
> I'll move a new copy of the html into users-lounge before release, and
> will try poking at the hardcopy versions too (but I consider the
> hardcopy fixes noncritical since we are so far past the "freeze"
> point).
>
> Depends on the actual release schedule as to whether they will get in
> to the hardcopy; the pg_group stuff doesn't open a large can of worms,
> but we might want a few days for it to settle out??
I have no probs with extending the release a couple of days ... Wednesday
sound good for everyone, as things stand now?
Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy@hub.org secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: