Re: Fyracle?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Richard_D_Levine@raytheon.com
Тема Re: Fyracle?
Дата
Msg-id OF38FCAD0B.12A8356B-ON05257018.004CF35C-05257018.004DA04C@ftw.us.ray.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Fyracle?  (Russ Brown <pickscrape@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Fyracle?  (Geraldo Lopes de Souza <geraldo-lopes@bol.com.br>)
Список pgsql-general
Some comments:

> I've just been sent this link by our DBA (pro MySQL but even more
> Anti-Postgres):

I can see skript kiddies preferring MySQL, but a DBA?  Time for a
credentials review.

Firebird is a good small database (small resource footprint) that handles
small databases with many users well.  It doesn't scale well due to its
single file data storage implementation.  A good disk farm is mostly wasted
on it.

I think that comparing Firebird to Oracle functionality can only be done in
an extremely superficial manner because of the difference in scalability.
So they implemented PL/SQL.  Whoopee.  Get the source for GNAT and do it
for PostgreSQL, if anybody cares.

Rick

pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org wrote on 06/06/2005 05:12:05 AM:

> I've just been sent this link by our DBA (pro MySQL but even more
> Anti-Postgres):
>
> http://www.janus-software.com/fb_fyracle.html
>
> I want to know how they've calculated the numbers that they're created
> those pie graphs from. The only thing I can think of that Postgres
> doesn't have for 'transactions' is two-phase commit, and yet it's
> given it 1/2 functionality.
>
> Anybody else care to comment?
>
> --
>
> Russ
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
>     (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org)


В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Large Object => invalid input syntax for integer: ""
Следующее
От: Richard Huxton
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Large Object => invalid input syntax for integer: ""