Re: Command prompt replication.

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Theo Galanakis
Тема Re: Command prompt replication.
Дата
Msg-id D1444817B78AB546BF2896C2B70E7F04371E7F@ganesh.au.lpint.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Command prompt replication.  (Theo Galanakis <Theo.Galanakis@lonelyplanet.com.au>)
Ответы Re: Command prompt replication.  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Список pgsql-admin
I also should add....
 
This is the results of slave_stat when running on the slave, this looks peculiar:
 
 /usr/local/pgsql/bin/slave_stat  /usr/local/pgsql/mcp_data 0
Sync: DESYNC
First record in queue: 0
Last received record: 0
Last restored record: 0

-----Original Message-----
From: Theo Galanakis
Sent: Thursday, 20 January 2005 2:09 PM
To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Subject: [ADMIN] Command prompt replication.

Hi,
        I'm evaluating command prompts replication server and have an issue I need help to resolve.

        I have install the master and slave from the postgres code supplied from command prompt. Have created a benchpg database which is automatically created by the contrib program, pg_bench. Then proceeded to copy that database to the slave via pg_dump, etc...

        Im currently running both databases on separate servers. And I have started up :

 /usr/local/pgsql/bin/mcp_server -c /usr/local/pgsql/etc/mcp_server.conf -l /var/log/mcp_server.log &

        Based on the output both pg servers connect to the mcp server successfully..

        Ok..

        Not testing the replication by inserting a record into the master database table branches.

        As soon as I enter this record /var/log/mcp_server.log is populated with :
 

DEBUG_MSG:  MCP-M-Recv| recno: 16003065  txnid:    85  datalen:    25  flags: TABLE_BEGIN TABLE_LIST TABLE_END

DEBUG:  Store master tables list in /usr/local/pgsql/mcp_data/txlog_mcp_master_table_list
DEBUG_MSG:  MCP-M-Recv| recno: 16003066  txnid:    86  datalen:     4  flags: TXBEGIN DATA

DEBUG_MSG:  MCP-M-Recv| recno: 16003067  txnid:    86  datalen:     4  flags: DATA

DEBUG_MSG:  MCP-M-Recv| recno: 16003068  txnid:    86  datalen:    44  flags: DATA

DEBUG_MSG:  MCP-M-Recv| recno: 16003069  txnid:    86  datalen:    12  flags: DATA

DEBUG_MSG:  MCP-M-Recv| recno: 16003070  txnid:    86  datalen:    16  flags: DATA

DEBUG_MSG:  MCP-M-Recv| recno: 16003071  txnid:    86  datalen:     4  flags: DATA TXEND

DEBUG_MASTER:  MCP Receive TXEND => mcp_ack_recno: 16003071
DEBUG_MASTER:  MCP Send ACK to Master => ACK reco: 16003071, mcp_ack_recno = 0
DEBUG_MSG:  MCP-M-Send| recno: 16003071  txnid:     0  datalen:     0  flags: !ACK

DEBUG_SLAVE:  0: TABLE_LIST => SKIP recno: 16003065
DEBUG_SLAVE:  MCP Send TXBEGIN to Slave(0)
DEBUG_SLAVE:  MCP send TXEND to Slave(0)
DEBUG_SLAVE:  0, Send INCSKIP
DEBUG_MSG:  MCP-S(0)-Send| recno: 16003071  txnid:    86  datalen:     4  flags: DATA TXEND

DEBUG_MSG:  MCP-S(0)-Recv| recno: 16003071  txnid:     0  datalen:     0  flags: !ACK

DEBUG_SLAVE:  0: Recv ACK from Slave(0) => Slave(0).vrecno = 16003071

On the slave server the /var/log/postgresql.log is polutated with this:

LOG:  INCSKIP to 16003071
LOG:  SET mcp_ack_recno: 16003071

Based on my limited knowledge and little documentation provided by command prompt, all looks well??? However the record I added to the master has not been copied to the slave.

Regards,
        Theo

______________________________________________________________________
This email, including attachments, is intended only for the addressee
and may be confidential, privileged and subject to copyright. If you
have received this email in error, please advise the sender and delete
it. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must not
use, copy or disclose its content to anyone. You must not copy or
communicate to others content that is confidential or subject to
copyright, unless you have the consent of the content owner.

В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Michael Fuhr
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Privileges where not restored
Следующее
От: "Troyston Campano"
Дата:
Сообщение: Oracle and Postgresql Play Nice Together on Same Computer?