Re: Trouble with plan statistics for behaviour for query.

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Maciek Sakrejda
Тема Re: Trouble with plan statistics for behaviour for query.
Дата
Msg-id CAOtHd0Bh+LxwQy70wfr9khrKGbz+umZBQDXYOnLLee4ZJ9e9Pw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Trouble with plan statistics for behaviour for query.  (Vitalii Tymchyshyn <tivv00@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Trouble with plan statistics for behaviour for query.  (Trevor Campbell <tcampbell@atlassian.com>)
Re: Trouble with plan statistics for behaviour for query.  (Trevor Campbell <tcampbell@atlassian.com>)
Список pgsql-performance
> If I am correct, JDBC uses named portal only on the 5th time you use
> PreparedStatement (configurable). Before it uses unnamed thing that should
> work as if you did embed the value.

If this is due to the difference in parameter type information, this
doesn't have anything to do with named portals.

My guess is that the driver has one idea about parameter types (based
on either the specific setTypeFoo call or the Java type of the
parameter passed to setObject), and the server another (based on the
type information of the CHANGEGROUP.ISSUEID column). Actually, I'm
rather surprised to see 'real' there: if you're using setObject with a
Long, I would imagine that turns into a bigint (which I believe the
server knows how to coerce to numeric). Can you show us your JDBC
code?

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: does the query planner consider work_mem?
Следующее
От: Chris Rimmer
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Select from sequence in slow query log