Re: random_page_cost = 2.0 on Heroku Postgres

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jeff Janes
Тема Re: random_page_cost = 2.0 on Heroku Postgres
Дата
Msg-id CAMkU=1xnK+HiW4cZS_qy0vMJeDXFgf9+XDuz0uVX+iNCukejqA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: random_page_cost = 2.0 on Heroku Postgres  (Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: random_page_cost = 2.0 on Heroku Postgres  (Peter van Hardenberg <pvh@pvh.ca>)
Список pgsql-performance
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 6:28 PM, Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 6:45 PM, Peter van Hardenberg <pvh@pvh.ca> wrote:
>> Having read the thread, I don't really see how I could study what a
>> more principled value would be.
>
> Agreed.  Just pointing out more research needs to be done.
>
>> That said, I have access to a very large fleet in which to can collect
>> data so I'm all ears for suggestions about how to measure and would
>> gladly share the results with the list.
>
> I wonder if some kind of script that grabbed random queries and ran
> them with explain analyze and various random_page_cost to see when
> they switched and which plans are faster would work?

But if you grab a random query and execute it repeatedly, you
drastically change the caching.

Results from any execution after the first one are unlikely to give
you results which are meaningful to the actual production situation.

Cheers,

Jeff

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Frank Lanitz
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Inserts or Updates
Следующее
От: Alessandro Gagliardi
Дата:
Сообщение: timestamp with time zone