On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Filip Rembiałkowski
<plk.zuber@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 5:43 PM, Alex Vinnik <alvinnik.g@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> It sure turned out that default settings are not a good fit.
>
>
> do you know pgtune?
> it's a good tool for starters, if you want a fast postgres and don't really
> want to learn what's behind the scenes.
>
> random_page_cost=1 might be not what you really want.
> it would mean that random reads are as fast as as sequential reads, which
> probably is true only for SSD
Or that the "reads" are cached and coming from RAM, which is almost
surely the case here.
Cheers,
Jeff