Re: Aggregate and many LEFT JOIN

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От kimaidou
Тема Re: Aggregate and many LEFT JOIN
Дата
Msg-id CAMKXKO5qvnLYCYRJux4yaN=Lj-phCgnE+KBere7VS7d31z78JA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Aggregate and many LEFT JOIN  (Michael Lewis <mlewis@entrata.com>)
Ответы Re: Aggregate and many LEFT JOIN  (Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>)
Список pgsql-performance
Дерево обсуждения
I manage to avoid the disk sort after performing a VACUUM ANALYSE;
And with a session work_mem = '250MB'


It stills spent 16s
It seems this kind of query will need better hardware to scale...

Thanks for your help


Le lun. 25 févr. 2019 à 19:30, Michael Lewis <mlewis@entrata.com> a écrit :


On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 2:44 AM kimaidou <kimaidou@gmail.com> wrote:
I have better results with this version. Basically, I run a first query only made for aggregation, and then do a JOIN to get other needed data.


Not really "fast", but I gained 30%
 

It still seems that disk sort and everything after that is where the query plan dies. It seems odd that it went to disk if work_mem was already 250MB. Can you allocate more as a test? As an alternative, if this is a frequently needed data, can you aggregate this data and keep a summarized copy updated periodically?

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: MichaelDBA
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Query slow for new participants
Следующее
От: Justin Pryzby
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Aggregate and many LEFT JOIN