Re: Delete, foreign key, index usage

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Rick Otten
Тема Re: Delete, foreign key, index usage
Дата
Msg-id CAMAYy4KMt-NxqmhNmLr5gxH_WOJqnmP17BGXCj1G37YMk2jR2Q@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Delete, foreign key, index usage  (Johann Spies <johann.spies@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-performance
Дерево обсуждения

On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 6:40 AM, Johann Spies <johann.spies@gmail.com> wrote:
On 4 April 2017 at 14:07, Johann Spies <johann.spies@gmail.com> wrote:

> Why would that be?

To answer my own question.  After experimenting a lot we found that
9.6 uses a parallel seqscan that is actually a lot faster than using
the index on these large tables.

This, to us was a surprise!


If you have modern GPU's available, you could try the pg-strom extension - https://github.com/pg-strom/devel
It leverages GPU's to further parallelize scans.


В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Johann Spies
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Delete, foreign key, index usage
Следующее
От: Dinesh Chandra 12108
Дата:
Сообщение: How to send content of log file in official mailid.