Re: LDAP with TLS is taking more time in Postgresql 11.5

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Mani Sankar
Тема Re: LDAP with TLS is taking more time in Postgresql 11.5
Дата
Msg-id CAEtVwW1f=ZAk1F8+yjvujVxwzAZKOpBuH_8_vEt=vVVddCV_eg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: LDAP with TLS is taking more time in Postgresql 11.5  (Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>)
Ответы Re: LDAP with TLS is taking more time in Postgresql 11.5
Список pgsql-general
Hi Adrian,

Should I want to try this configuration?

Regards,
Mani.

On Tue, 25 Feb, 2020, 9:24 pm Adrian Klaver, <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com> wrote:
On 2/24/20 9:07 PM, Mani Sankar wrote:
Please reply to list also.
Ccing list.
> Hi Adrian,
>
> Thanks for replying. Below are the requested details.
>
> ################ Configuration in 9.4 PG Version
>
> local all all ldap ldapserver=XXXXXXXXXXXXXX ldapport=3268
> ldapprefix="ADS\" ldapsuffix="" ldaptls=1
>
> host all someuser xx.xx.xx.xx/32 ldap ldapserver=XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
> ldapport=3268 ldapprefix="ADS\" ldapsuffix="" ldaptls=1
>
> host all someuser ::1/128 ldap ldapserver=XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX ldapport=3268
> ldapprefix="ADS\" ldapsuffix="" ldaptls=1
>
> host all all 0.0.0.0/0 <http://0.0.0.0/0> ldap
> ldapserver=XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX ldapport=3268 ldapprefix="ADS\" ldapsuffix=""
> ldaptls=1
>
> host all all ::1/128 ldap ldapserver=XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX ldapport=3268
> ldapprefix="ADS\" ldapsuffix="" ldaptls=1
>
> host replication someuser 0.0.0.0/0 <http://0.0.0.0/0> ldap
> ldapserver=XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX ldapport=3268 ldapprefix="ADS\" ldapsuffix=""
> ldaptls=1
>
> host replication someuser 0.0.0.0/0 <http://0.0.0.0/0> ldap
> ldapserver=XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX ldapport=3268 ldapprefix="ADS\" ldapsuffix=""
> ldaptls=1
>
> ############ Configuration in 11.5 Version.
>
> local all all ldap ldapserver=XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX ldapport=3268
> ldapprefix="ADS\" ldapsuffix="" ldaptls=1
>
> host all someuser xx.xx.xx.xx/32 ldap ldapserver=XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
> ldapport=3268 ldapprefix="ADS\" ldapsuffix="" ldaptls=1
>
> host all someuser ::1/128 ldap ldapserver=XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX ldapport=3268
> ldapprefix="ADS\" ldapsuffix="" ldaptls=1
>
> host all all 0.0.0.0/0 <http://0.0.0.0/0> ldap
> ldapserver=XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX ldapport=3268 ldapprefix="ADS\" ldapsuffix=""
> ldaptls=1
>
> host all all ::1/128 ldap ldapserver=XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX ldapport=3268
> ldapprefix="ADS\" ldapsuffix="" ldaptls=1
>
> host replication someuser 0.0.0.0/0 <http://0.0.0.0/0> ldap
> ldapserver=XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX ldapport=3268 ldapprefix="ADS\" ldapsuffix=""
> ldaptls=1
>
> host replication someuser 0.0.0.0/0 <http://0.0.0.0/0> ldap
> ldapserver=XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX ldapport=3268 ldapprefix="ADS\" ldapsuffix=""
> ldaptls=1
>
> host replication someuser 0.0.0.0/0 <http://0.0.0.0/0> ldap
> ldapserver=XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX ldapport=3268 ldapprefix="ADS\" ldapsuffix=""
> ldaptls=1
>
> host    replication     replicator  XXXXXXXXXXXXX/22        md5
>
> host    replication     replicator  1XXXXXXXXXXXX/22        md5
>
> Linux Version: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.10 (Santiago)
>
> Server Installation is Source code installation. Custom build for our
> environment.
>
> Authentication logs from PG 11.5:
>
> 2020-02-24 00:00:15 MST [25089]:
> application=[unknown],host=xx.xx.xxx.xx(55742),user=[unknown],db=[unknown],state=00000
> LOG:  connection received: host=xx.xx.xxx.xx port=55742
>
> 2020-02-24 00:00:16 MST [25090]:
> application=[unknown],host=xx.xx.xxx.xx(55748),user=[unknown],db=[unknown],state=00000
> LOG:  connection received: host=xx.xx.xxx.xx port=55748
>
> 2020-02-24 00:00:16 MST [25092]:
> application=[unknown],host=xx.xx.xxx.xx(55765),user=[unknown],db=[unknown],state=00000
> LOG:  connection received: host=xx.xx.xxx.xx port=55765
>
> 2020-02-24 00:00:16 MST [25093]:
> application=[unknown],host=xx.xx.xxx.xx(55770),user=[unknown],db=[unknown],state=00000
> LOG:  connection received: host=xx.xx.xxx.xx port=55770
>
> 2020-02-24 00:00:17 MST [25090]:
> application=[unknown],host=xx.xx.xxx.xx(55748),user=Someuser,db=test_db,state=00000
> LOG:  connection authorized: user=Someuser database=test_db
>
> 2020-02-24 00:00:17 MST [25089]:
> application=[unknown],host=xx.xx.xxx.xx(55742),user=Someuser,db=test_db,state=00000
> LOG:  connection authorized: user=Someuser database=test_db
>
> 2020-02-24 00:00:17 MST [25092]:
> application=[unknown],host=xx.xx.xxx.xx(55765),user=Someuser,db=test_db,state=00000
> LOG:  connection authorized: user=Someuser database=test_db
>
> 2020-02-24 00:00:17 MST [25093]:
> application=[unknown],host=xx.xx.xxx.xx(55770),user=Someuser,db=test_db,state=00000
> LOG:  connection authorized: user=Someuser database=test_db
>
> Authentication logs from PG 9.4:
>
> 2020-02-17 22:40:01 MST [127575]:
> application=[unknown],host=xx.xx.xx.xx(39451),user=[unknown],db=[unknown] LOG: 
> connection received: host=xx.xx.xx.xx port=39451
>
> 2020-02-17 22:40:01 MST [127575]:
> application=[unknown],host=xx.xx.xx.xx(39451),user=Someuser,db=test_db
> LOG:  connection authorized: user=Someuser database=test_db
>
> 2020-02-24 21:57:44 MST [117472]:
> application=[unknown],host=xx.xx.xx.xx(58500),user=[unknown],db=[unknown] LOG: 
> connection received: host=xx.xx.xx.xx port=58500
>
> 2020-02-24 21:57:44 MST [117472]:
> application=[unknown],host=xx.xx.xx.xx(58500),user=Someuser,db=test_db
> LOG:  connection authorized: user=Someuser database=test_db
>
> 2020-02-24 21:58:27 MST [117620]:
> application=[unknown],host=xx.xx.xx.xx(58520),user=[unknown],db=[unknown] LOG: 
> connection received: host=xx.xx.xx.xx port=58520
>
> 2020-02-24 21:58:27 MST [117620]:
> application=[unknown],host=xx.xx.xx.xx(58520),user=Someuser,db=test_db
> LOG:  connection authorized: user=Someuser database=test_db
>
> 2020-02-24 21:58:31 MST [117632]:
> application=[unknown],host=xx.xx.xx.xx(58524),user=[unknown],db=[unknown] LOG: 
> connection received: host=xx.xx.xx.xx port=58524
>
> 2020-02-24 21:58:31 MST [117632]:
> application=[unknown],host=xx.xx.xx.xx(58524),user=Someuser,db=test_db
> LOG:  connection authorized: user=Someuser database=test_db
>
> We also have a local .ldaprc file with below entry
>
> TLS_REQCERT allow
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 2:28 AM Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
> <mailto:adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>> wrote:
>
>     On 2/24/20 11:50 AM, Mani Sankar wrote:
>      > Hi All,
>      >
>      > We have recently upgraded our postgres servers from 9.4 version
>     to 11.5
>      > version. Post upgrade we are see delay in authentication.
>      >
>      > Issue is when we are using ldaptls=1 the authentication takes 1
>     second
>      > or greater than that. But if I disable ldaptls it's getting
>      > authenticated within milliseconds.
>      >
>      > But in 9.4 even if I enable ldaptls it's getting authenticated
>     within
>      > milliseconds any idea why we are facing the issue?
>
>     This is going to need a good deal more information:
>
>     1) OS the server is running on and did the OS or OS version change with
>     the upgrade?
>
>     2) How was the server installed from packages(if so from where?) or
>     from
>     source?
>
>     3) The configuration for LDAP in pg_hba.conf.
>
>     4) Pertinent information from the Postgres log.
>
>     5) Pertinent information from the system log.
>
>      >
>      > Regards,
>      > Mani.
>      >
>
>
>     --
>     Adrian Klaver
>     adrian.klaver@aklaver.com <mailto:adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>
>


--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@aklaver.com

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Michael Lewis
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Connections dropping while using Postgres backend DB with Ejabberd
Следующее
От: Adrian Klaver
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: LDAP with TLS is taking more time in Postgresql 11.5