The only difference JDBC has over psql is that it has to connect via
tcpip. Not sure about pgadmin.
Dave Cramer
dave.cramer(at)credativ(dot)ca
http://www.credativ.ca
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 6:47 PM, Sam Nelson <samn@consistentstate.com> wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> A client is hitting an issue with JDBC:
> org.postgresql.util.PSQLException: Connection refused. Check that the
> hostname and port are correct and that the postmaster is accepting
> TCP/IP connections.
>
> -pg_hba.conf is set to trust 0.0.0.0/0 (IPv4 only)
> -listen_addresses is *
> -I can find no evidence of iptables running on the server.
> -PGAdmin connects just fine.
> -psql connects just fine.
> -I can find no errors in the log file from that day for the user that
> the client is trying to log in as.
>
> We're working on getting access to more details about how they're
> trying to connect, but in the mean time, does anyone know if JDBC has
> any issues connecting that psql and PGAdmin wouldn't have? Is it
> possible that JDBC is somehow susceptible to connection issues that
> JDBC and psql are not?
> ---
> ===========================
> Samuel Nelson
> Consistent State
> www.consistentstate.com
> 303-955-0509
> ===========================
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
>