Re: pg_rewind vs superuser

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Magnus Hagander
Тема Re: pg_rewind vs superuser
Дата
Msg-id CABUevEyc_4gLZSFDacsbC=Jy_-rEhM4zOd3Gr=7OdA3pBZAK2g@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: pg_rewind vs superuser  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Ответы Re: pg_rewind vs superuser  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Список pgsql-hackers


On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 10:06 AM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 09:59:29AM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> A related question is, could we (for 12+) actually make the problem go
> away? As in, can we detect the state and just have pg_rewind issue the
> checkpoint as needed?

I am not sure as you can still bump into the legit case where one is
trying to rewind an instance which is on the same timeline as the
source, and nothing should happen in this case.

If that is the case, would running a CHECKPOINT actually cause a problem?

 
--

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_rewind vs superuser
Следующее
От: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Protect syscache from bloating with negative cache entries