Re: Benchmarking a large server

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Cédric Villemain
Тема Re: Benchmarking a large server
Дата
Msg-id BANLkTikecJCGWH0WyKFiSnC08kmcwS7FqA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Benchmarking a large server  (Chris Hoover <revoohc@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Benchmarking a large server  (Craig James <craig_james@emolecules.com>)
Список pgsql-performance
2011/5/9 Chris Hoover <revoohc@gmail.com>:
> I've got a fun problem.
> My employer just purchased some new db servers that are very large.  The
> specs on them are:
> 4 Intel X7550 CPU's (32 physical cores, HT turned off)
> 1 TB Ram
> 1.3 TB Fusion IO (2 1.3 TB Fusion IO Duo cards in a raid 10)
> 3TB Sas Array (48 15K 146GB spindles)
> The issue we are running into is how do we benchmark this server,
> specifically, how do we get valid benchmarks for the Fusion IO card?
>  Normally to eliminate the cache effect, you run iozone and other benchmark
> suites at 2x the ram.  However, we can't do that due to 2TB > 1.3TB.
> So, does anyone have any suggestions/experiences in benchmarking storage
> when the storage is smaller then 2x memory?

You can reduce the memory size on server boot.
If you use linux, you can add a 'mem=512G' to your boot time
parameters. (maybe it supports only K or M, so 512*1024...)

> Thanks,
> Chris



--
Cédric Villemain               2ndQuadrant
http://2ndQuadrant.fr/     PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Josh Berkus
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Postgres 9.0.4 + Hot Standby + FusionIO Drive + Performance => Query failed ERROR: catalog is missing 1 attribute(s) for relid 172226
Следующее
От: Craig James
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Benchmarking a large server