-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
- --On Thursday, November 01, 2007 16:59:14 +0100 Magnus Hagander
<magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
> No. All those cases are reasons for acceptable delays. But how often
> does say network connectivity go away for an hour? If they do, you need
> to better hosting provider.
You really don't have a clue on how an SMTP server works, do you? If delivery
fails, it backs up and tries again *later* ... if there is a high volume of
email going through said server, *later* could very well be 1 hour ... and, in
fact, its an incremental backup, so it actually works out to be something like:
Try now, fail, try in 5 minutes, fail, try in 10 minutes, fail, try in 20
minutes, fail, etc ... I'm not sure if its a simple '2x' algorithm, but the
delay between attempts does get progressively greater, so if it fails after
trying at '40 minutes', then it will be another hour and a half after *that*
beofre it will try again, etc ...
> A couple of minutes delay is perfectly acceptable. A couple of hours is
> an indication that something is wrong.
Well, when you see a couple of hours delay, then do something *useful* and let
me know ... the only *useful* reports I've had in the past 24 hours dealt with
a problem that Tom reported yesterday and that I fixed within minutes of him
reporting ... the headers that you and Bruce sent me were *from that problem*
...
- ----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFHKfvB4QvfyHIvDvMRAgApAJ4vB/bLJJaclnOD+OWG0J3P75YBgQCfdsG+
w8+K+VDaTerVojFGd3+DyHU=
=dynu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----