2010/6/23 Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine@hi-media.com> writes:
>> > Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
>> >> a) Eliminate WAL logging entirely
>
> If we elimiate WAL logging, that means a reinstall is required for even
> a postmaster crash, which is a new non-durable behavior.
>
> Also, we just added wal_level = minimal, which might end up being a poor
> name choice of we want wal_level = off in PG 9.1. Perhaps we should
> have used wal_level = crash_safe in 9.0.
>
> I have added the following TODO:
>
> Consider a non-crash-safe wal_level that eliminates WAL activity
>
> * http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2010-06/msg00300.php
>
> --
isn't fsync to off enought?
Regards
Pavel
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
> EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
>
> + None of us is going to be here forever. +
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
>